A total of seven test persons (TP 02, TP 05, TP 08, TP 09, TP 11, TP 12, TP 14) explicitly note that question 8 is very similar to question 5, which has already been answered. For test subjects 05, 08, 09 and 12, the two sets of questionnaires "basically aim at the same thing" and they indicate that they could not distin-guish between company/organization and profession:
The test persons 06 and 09 answer question 5 and question 8 completely identically. Four further test persons (TP 07, TP 08, TP 11, TP 12) state for item c) that they gave the same answer as for the corresponding item in question 5.
Furthermore, it is noticeable here too (as in question 5) that a total of seven test persons (TP 02, TP 03, TP 07, TP 08, TP 11, TP 12, TP 15) did not interpret the three statements uniformly, but sometimes thought of the profession they had learned and sometimes of the company or the job they were currently doing.
| Itemtext | Aktiv getestet |
|---|---|
Ich bin bereit, härter zu arbeiten als ich normalerweise muss, um die allerhöchsten Anforderungen an meinen Beruf zu erfüllen.Itemtext:Empfehlungen:
We recommend adding the word "current" to this statement (see item b) to make it clear that the statement refers to current and not former employment. We also recommend that the word "highest" be softened somewhat and replaced by "highest". Furthermore, it should be made clearer what is meant by "demands on my profession". Finally, we propose to place the subordinate clause at the beginning of the sentence to prevent it from being ignored when answering the item (see battery of questions 5). A possible formulation would be:
“In order to perform my professional duties in the best possible way, I am willing to work harder than I normally have to.“ [„Um meine beruflichen Aufgaben bestmöglich zu erfüllen, bin ich bereit, härter zu arbeiten als ich normalerweise muss.“] Befund zum Item:In each case five test persons agree (or strongly agree) with the statement and disagree. Three test persons (TP 03, TP 04, TP 15) answer "neither nor" and two test persons "don’t know" (TP 05, TP 08).
Three of the test persons who answer "neither nor" or "don’t know" (TP 04, TP 05, TP 08) justify their answer by stating that it is unclear to them what the question is aimed at or what is meant by the "all-highest occupational requirements:
Three test persons (TP 07, TP 11, TP 12) state that the formulation "highest" requirements is a little exaggerated, which is why they tend to tone down their answer and indicate that they agree with the statement to a lesser extent:
Thema der Frage:
Arbeit & Beruf/ Arbeitsmotivation & -einstellungen
Konstrukt:Connection with profession
|
Ja |
Ich bin stolz darauf, in meinem derzeitigen Beruf zu arbeiten.Itemtext:Empfehlungen:
No changes recommended.
Befund zum Item:The majority of the test persons (n = 11) agree or strongly agree with this statement. Two test persons (TP 01, TP 09) answer with "neither nor" and two further test persons with "disagree" (TP 05, TP 10).
Test person 05 justifies her "disagree" answer with her rejection of the term "pride": "I am happy to work in my company and do my job well and with pleasure. But proud? Pride is something I personally don't know that much about anyway. I would be proud if I did something more noble, e.g. animal rescuers, doctors, rescue services, they really do save people. Or development aid." (TP 05). Three test persons (TP 02, TP 03, TP11) state that they thought of their company/organization and not of their current activity as intended when answering this statement. The remaining 12 test persons said that they were thinking about their current job or (identical) learned profession. Only test person 15 refers (erroneously) to her learned occupation when answering the item, which however does not correspond to her current activity. Thema der Frage:
Arbeit & Beruf/ Arbeitsmotivation & -einstellungen
Konstrukt:Connection with profession
|
Ja |
Ich würde eine andere, besser bezahlte Stelle ablehnen, um in meinem Beruf zu bleiben.Itemtext:Empfehlungen:
We recommend avoiding the negative wording "reject" in this statement, as this causes difficulties in using the response scale. A possible reformulation would be:
"I would retain my current occupation even if I were offered another, better-paid position." [„Ich würde meine derzeitige berufliche Tätigkeit beibehalten, auch wenn man mir eine andere, besser bezahlte Stelle anbieten würde.“] Befund zum Item:The majority of the test persons (n = 8) disagree (strongly) with this statement. However, as with question 5, it became clear from the questions of the test directors that one test person (TP 13) had ticked a "wrong" answer due to the negatively formulated item and the associated difficulty in expressing with the answer scale that he/she would like to continue in his/her current job and actually wanted to answer "agree" instead of "disagree": "I would not agree with this question (that I would change) because I actually like my job very much and would possibly perform it in another company. But I didn't want to do something else arbitrarily." (TP 13, disagree).
Test person 01 also states that due to the negative wording he had difficulties in answering the statement: "I found it difficult to answer. I had to think about which answer I had to mark with a cross to say what I meant." (TP 01). The test persons 02 ("Don’t know") and 15 ("Neither nor") justify their answers, as (partly) already in question 5, by the fact that it depends on the respective circumstances whether one would refuse such a position or not. Several factors (and not only payment) would play a role here:
Thema der Frage:
Arbeit & Beruf/ Arbeitsmotivation & -einstellungen
Konstrukt:Connection with profession
|
Ja |
