Item Text | Actively tested |
---|---|
a.) that all citizens have an adequate standard of livingItem Text:Recommendations:
No changes recommended.
Findings:A respondent claims not to be able to answer item a) ("Can't say") and justifies his answer by saying that it is unclear to him what is meant by a "sufficient" standard of living. Her answer would be different depending on whether a sufficient standard of living meant that one "receives Hartz IV" or that everyone "has their own apartment or house".
Question Topic:
Politics/ Attitudes, appraisals, & ideologies
Construct:Attitudes towards democratic rights
|
Yes |
|
No |
|
No |
d.) that citizens may engage in acts of civil disobedience when they oppose government actionsItem Text:Recommendations:
Rephrase in:
"that citizens have the possibility of non-violent protest to express their clear opposition to government decisions." [„dass Bürger die Möglichkeit des gewaltlosen Protests haben, um ihre deutliche Ablehnung gegenüber Regierungsentscheidungen zum Ausdruck zu bringen.“] Or shorter and easier to understand for the respondents: "that citizens have the possibility of non-violent protest against government decisions." [„dass Bürger die Möglichkeit des gewaltlosen Protests gegenüber Regierungsentscheidungen haben.“] Findings:This item is predominantly classified as important or very important (n=16). Three test persons give the average value and one test person classifies the item as "rather not important".
When answering statement d), four test persons spontaneously express difficulties in understanding the concept of civil disobedience:
The difficulties that arise in answering statement d) due to the concept of "civil disobedience" are also illustrated by the fact that half of the test persons (n=10) state that they found it "rather difficult" or "very difficult" to answer the statement due to the concept of "rather difficult" or "very difficult". Question Topic:
Politics/ Attitudes, appraisals, & ideologies
Construct:Attitudes towards democratic rights
|
Yes |
|
No |
f.) that people convicted of serious crimes lose their citizen rightsItem Text:Recommendations:
The term "civil rights" should be specified by using several items each dealing with one civil right, for example:
1. "that people convicted of serious crimes lose the right to vote." [„dass Menschen, die wegen schwerer Verbrechen verurteilt wurden, das Wahlrecht verlieren.“] 2. "that people convicted of serious crimes lose the right to petition." [„dass Menschen, die wegen schwerer Verbrechen verurteilt wurden, das Petitionsrecht verlieren.“] 3. "..." etc. Findings:Four subjects (TP 05, TP 07, TP 10, TP 13) indicate that they have difficulty finding the correct scale value to express that they do not want "people to lose their civil rights“:
Question Topic:
Politics/ Attitudes, appraisals, & ideologies
Construct:Attitudes towards democratic rights
|
Yes |
g.) that long-term residents of a country, who are not citizens, have the right to vote in that country’s national electionsItem Text:Recommendations:
Rephrase in:
"that people who have lived in a country for a long time but are not naturalized there have the right to vote in nationwide elections. [„dass Menschen, die schon lange in einem Land leben, aber dort nicht eingebürgert sind, das Recht haben, bei landesweiten Wahlen abzustimmen.“] Findings:The test persons use the entire scale width. Only one test person (TP 03) answers with "Can't say" and justifies his answer by saying that he wants to abstain from this statement.
The term "national elections" is not interpreted by the test persons in the intended sense (national elections in different countries), but in the sense of "elections within Germany". The test persons think of very different elections (or combinations of elections). They are called the Bundestag elections (4 nominations), Bundestag and local elections (4 nominations), Bundestag and state elections (4 nominations), Bundestag and European elections (1 nomination), district or local elections (2 nominations) and all elections in Germany (5 nominations) The choices made in Germany are the frame of reference for the respondents when answering the item, although this is not necessarily means that the Answers of the test persons are only valid for Germany. The interviews do not provide any indications that the test persons have a different attitude to voting rights in other countries (see findings on the question as a whole). Problematic, however, is the finding that three test persons explicitly think of local elections and not national (i.e. nationwide) elections when answering the item. Their answers would be quite different if they were to interpret the item in the intended sense:
Question Topic:
Politics/ Attitudes, appraisals, & ideologies
Construct:Attitudes towards democratic rights
|
Yes |
|
No |
|
No |