Question: No changes recommended.
Response format: No changes recommended.
Eight out of ten test persons placed themselves on scale point 1, i.e., they stated that they had never viewed pornographic content in the last 14 days. One test person (TP 06) placed himself on scale point 2 ("rarely") and another (TP 01) answered "very often".
Two test persons (TP 09, 10) spontaneously commented on the questions that they could not com-pletely avoid pornographic content, but that they did not consume it intentionally:
What do the test persons understand by "pornographic content"?
The majority of the test persons (n = 9) referred exclusively to pornographic content on the Internet in their answer. There may have been a sequence effect here, i.e., the previous question 10, which dealt with Internet use for obtaining political information, radiated to question 11. On the other hand, pornographic content is predominantly consumed on the Internet. Whether this was a sequence effect or a valid response behavior could not be determined on the basis of the cognitive interviews.
Only test person 04 stated that, in addition to Internet content, she had also thought of print media and videocassettes/DVDs: “There are also magazines, at newsstands and elsewhere. Due to that, you can buy movies and porn magazines. That's exactly what I was thinking of now.”
By "pornographic content" most test persons understood the exposure and presentation of men and women as well as depictions of sexual acts:
How sensitive do the test persons perceive the question to be?
The test persons were asked to indicate on a seven-point scale how uncomfortable they found being asked the question (see Table N2_F11). Six test persons (TP 03, 04, 07, 08, 09, 10) indicated that they found it "not at all unpleasant." These test persons justified their answers either by saying that they had been able to answer honestly (due to the fact that they had never looked at pornographic content on the Internet in the last 14 days) and that there had therefore been no reason to feel uncomfortable, or that the question had not triggered any feeling of shame in them:
1 Not at all unpleasant | 6 |
2 | - |
3 | 1 |
4 | 2 |
5 | - |
6 | - |
7 Very unpleasant | 1 |
Three test persons stated that they found answering the question "somewhat unpleasant" (scale points 3 and 4). They justified their classification by saying that on the one hand they were open in dealing with the topic, but on the other hand it was also very personal or they had been surprised by the question:
Only test person 06 found answering the question "very uncomfortable" (scale point 7), explaining that this was a "very intimate question".
Furthermore, test persons were asked to indicate on a seven-point scale how honestly they thought respondents would answer this question in a real survey (see Table N4_F11). Overall, test persons rated respondent honesty rather low. Most of them placed themselves on the second scale point and justified their answer by saying that most people would be embarrassed to talk about this intimate topic:
1 Not honest at all | - |
2 | 4 |
3 | 2 |
4 | 3 |
5 | 1 |
6 | - |
7 Very honest | - |
The remaining test persons justified their answers (in the middle range of the scale) by saying that it depended on the individual or that gender played a role in answering the question honestly: