Slightly more than half of the test subjects (n = 8) decide to answer "No, not yet, but I probably would." Test subject 05 answers "I cannot say" and justifies this as follows: "I haven't done it yet, because I haven't had that kind of job with a lot of responsibility. [...] The question says "give up" and I cannot say that. I also can't imagine that I'll ever get into such a high position." (TP 05). This test person indicates that he should actually check "No, [...] but probably I would". However, the term "give up" implies that one already has a job with high responsibility. On the other hand, a formulation with "give up" - analogous to question 1 - implies, due to the choice of words alone, that in addition to a position that one already holds, one does not even aspire to a position with high responsibility.
Of the three test persons who answered "yes" to this question, two persons (TP 08, TP 14) chose this answer category without having read the other answers at all. Both test persons change their answer to "No, [...] but would probably do so" in the course of the interview, i.e. in response to the test leader's question, since they have not yet been in the situation of having given up a job with a high level of responsibility:
When asked how easy or difficult it was for test terson 08 to answer this question, she says she found it rather difficult "because two things are asked at once. [...] "Have you ever" and "would you". So future and past." (TP 08). This shows that the item formulation does not take into account the intuitive answering behavior of the respondents. Only test person 02 answers correctly with "yes", whereby she explains her answering behavior in the sense of "renounce" and not in the sense of "give up": "I once had the opportunity to take over a company, to become self-employed. I gave up on that. For the reasons I've already mentioned [nursing care in the family]." (TP 02).
Of the eight test persons who answered "No, not yet, but I probably would", seven interpret the question in the intended sense, for example:
Test person 03 thinks, as in question 1, of their professional activity in a family business and associates in this context with "professional activity with high responsibility" that one generally bears responsibility for every task one is given: "Everyone bears responsibility. If I come into someone's garden and different things are to be done, then I bear the responsibility for getting them done” (TP 03).
Two of the three test persons who state that they have not yet given up any activity with high responsibility and are unlikely to do so in the future understand the question correctly:
Test subject 09 ticked this answer, as in question 1, although she was contrary to her attitude, as she interpreted the question in the opposite sense: "No, I wouldn't do that either. For the same reasons as with the previous question. Family is more important than a job. Career is also important, but family is the first priority for me. I would never do that." (TP 09).
With the exception of test person 03, who associates a certain degree of responsibility independent of the respective activity, all test persons understand a "professional activity with high responsibility" to be a leading position or a management position.
