Item Text | Actively tested |
---|---|
|
No |
|
No |
c. Read and understand an instruction manual or manual to operate a new appliance, such as a television or washing machine.Item Text:Recommendations:
Here it should be specified that longer texts are meant and not short How-Tos. The text of the question could be modified and simplified as follows: The term "devices" should be omitted and instead concrete examples should be given:
"Read and understand detailed operating instructions or a manual in order to operate a new TV set or washing machine, for example." [„Eine ausführliche Bedienungsanleitung oder ein Handbuch lesen und verstehen, um bspw. einen neuen Fernseher oder eine neue Waschmaschine bedienen zu können.“] Alternatively, only the word "detailed" can be added to the original item:: "Read and understand detailed operating instructions or a manual to be able to operate a new appliance, e.g. a television or washing machine.” [„Eine ausführliche Bedienungsanleitung oder ein Handbuch lesen und verstehen, um ein neues Gerät bedienen zu können, z. B. einen Fernseher oder eine Waschmaschine.“] Findings:For this item the full width of the scale was used: Ten test persons, i.e. half of them, indicate "I can without problems", eight test persons say "I can, but with certain difficulties", one test person (TP 12) indicates "I can, but with great difficulties" and another one (TP 03) indicates "I cannot".
Overall, the test persons have no problems with the description "to operate a device". Out of 20 test persons, 16 think of technical devices, of which 13 test persons mention concrete devices such as TV, DVD recorder, laptop or telephone. Three persons name (additionally) furniture like cupboard (TP 08), desk (TP 13) or laminate (TP 14). With two test persons it remains unclear what kind of devices they think of (TP 05, 19). Nine test persons think exclusively of longer texts (TP 01, 03, 06, 09, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19) and five test persons think exclusively of shorter texts (TP 05, 10, 11, 13, 14). Four test persons think of both shorter and longer texts (TP 02, 04, 07, 08) and with another two test persons it remains unclear what they think of (TP 15, 20). The test persons who stated that they are able to read and understand an instruction manual or a manual "with certain difficulties" justify this in three different ways. The first reason is that the operation or the construction of new things is complicated:
Among the test persons who answered with no problems, there are three who report difficulties in the explanation of their answer:
Question Topic:
Job and career/ Job situation & professional activity
Construct:Self-assessment of reading skills
|
Yes |
|
No |
e. Cross-reading different internet pages to find different information on a specific topic, e.g. about a disease.Item Text:Recommendations:
No changes recommended.
Findings:19 out of 20 respondents answered this item, test person 11 does not use the Internet and therefore does not answer item e). Twelve of the 19 respondents said that they could read different websites without problems, the remaining seven respondents could do so with certain difficulty.
All 19 test persons, who answered this item, think of different internet pages, i.e. of considering several text sources. Of the 20 test persons, 16 understand the term "cross-reading" correctly. Twelve test persons understand the term "skimming over a text", two persons say that they do not read everything (TP 17, 20) and one person each states that they do not read in detail (TP 06) or search for keywords in the text (TP 07). The following are two examples of how the term "cross-reading" is described:
The test persons 07 and 14 note that diseases are a bad example in their opinion: "The topic of illness has irritated me here. This is by no means something I can only read across." (TP 07) and two other test persons express this at least indirectly:
Question Topic:
Job and career/ Job situation & professional activity
Construct:Self-assessment of reading skills
|
Yes |